On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 15:52 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 07/02/2019 15:47, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 07/02/2019 15:20, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24/01/2019 09:07, Erin Lo wrote:
> >>> From: Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> To support partitioned PPIs, 4 interrupt parameters should be valid
> >>> for sysirq.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c | 4 ++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c
> >>> index 90aaf19..282736a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mtk-sysirq.c
> >>> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static int mtk_sysirq_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> >>> unsigned int *type)
> >>> {
> >>> if (is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode)) {
> >>> - if (fwspec->param_count != 3)
> >>> + if (fwspec->param_count != 3 && fwspec->param_count != 4)
> >>
> >> Where is this 4th parameter used?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.txt#n14
> Sorry, I fired Send way too early.
>
> What I wanted to add is that it is not clear to me why this change would
> be required here, as this driver only supports SPIs. It could be fixed
> by just relaxing the binding itself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
Do you mean that we should change #interrupt-cells back to 3 for sysirq
and remove the 4th parameters of every spi interrupts in mt8183.dtsi
(i.e. 3 parameters for spi, 4 for ppi) such that we can discard this
patch?
If yes, we may need some time to verify the change before resending the
patch.
Thanks.
