Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 14:53 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:23 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > This patchset fixes the initial pinctrl support added for th g12a SoC >> > family, which is mainly around the register regions claimed by the >> > driver. >> > >> > Linus, would it possible for you to provide a tag with these changes to >> > Kevin ? >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git/log/?h=ib-meson-fixes >> >> > ATM, we can only use the devices for which the pinmux is already set by >> > the bootloader. Enabling the broken pinctrl driver could cause regressions >> > in kernelCI. Having a tag, would allow us to start using pinctrl on this >> > SoC in this cycle, w/o regression. It would be nice :) >> >> When you say "this cycle" do you mean I should target fixes (v5.0-rcN) >> or next (v5.1) with these patches? > > I was referring to the 5.1 release but it is a good question, I did not really > think about 5.0. > > Those changes are mainly fixes, so guess it could go in the 5.0 but support > for this SoC is still in its early stages, so either way is fine by me. > > Whatever is simpler for you I guess ;) If it's not too late, v5.0-rc is simpler for me as it means not having to deal with this as a dependency branch/tag. Kevin
