On 2/5/2019 3:03 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Jeffrey Hugo (2019-01-30 08:36:24)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index 7136ab1..5673a65 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -814,6 +814,21 @@
status = "disabled";
};
+ mmcc: clock-controller@c8c0000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,mmcc-msm8998";
+ #clock-cells = <1>;
+ #reset-cells = <1>;
+ #power-domain-cells = <1>;
+ reg = <0x0c8c0000 0x40000>;
+
+ clock-names =
+ "xo",
Weird newline here. Please put "xo" on the same line as clock-names.
+ "gpll0";
+ clocks =
+ <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>,
+ <&gcc GPLL0_OUT_MAIN>;
Ah ok, so only the multimedia clks get the xo clk from rpm for now?
Yes. With this entire series, its possible to retrofit GCC, but I
didn't tackle that since we'd need to consider backwards compatibility.
I hope to do this moving forward though.
--
Jeffrey Hugo
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
