On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 10:10:21 +0000
<Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> +
> +static void atmel_qspi_sam9x60_write_regs(const struct atmel_qspi *aq,
> + const struct spi_mem_op *op,
> + const struct atmel_qspi_cfg *cfg)
> +{
> + /* Clear pending interrupts */
> + (void)readl_relaxed(aq->regs + QSPI_SR);
> +
> + /* Set QSPI Instruction Frame registers */
> + writel_relaxed(cfg->iar, aq->regs + QSPI_IAR);
> + if (op->data.dir == SPI_MEM_DATA_IN)
> + writel_relaxed(cfg->icr, aq->regs + QSPI_RICR);
> + else
> + writel_relaxed(cfg->icr, aq->regs + QSPI_ICR);
Can you use WICR here (even if ICR == WICR)?
> + writel_relaxed(cfg->ifr, aq->regs + QSPI_IFR);
> +}
Hm, so the only difference we have is the RICR vs ICR reg and the
APBTFRTYP_READ vs SAMA5D2_WRITE_TRSFR bit. Not sure it deserves
creating 2 hooks for that. Can we have something like ->has_ricr in
the caps and then have an if/else block directly in
atmel_qspi_set_cfg()?
