Hi,
On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:40 PM Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> index d19486ba1e5e..07d9cd6fba7d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -325,6 +325,64 @@
> };
> };
>
> + adsp_pas: remoteproc-adsp {
> + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-adsp-pas";
After discussion with you offline I now understand why this is using
"-pas" and not "-pil".
...and I understand that on my particular board (which should use
"-pil") we'll juse leave this as status = "disabled".
It would be good if something in this series updated the bindings to
make it clearer since I can't find anything in these two files:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,adsp-pil.txt
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,adsp.txt
...explain when the "-pil" is used and when the "-pas" is used.
-Doug
