On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 7:59 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The "mediatek,larb-id" has already been parsed in MTK IOMMU driver.
> It's no need to parse it again in SMI driver. Only clean some codes.
> This patch is fit for all the current mt2701, mt2712, mt7623, mt8173
> and mt8183.
>
> After this patch, the "mediatek,larb-id" only be needed for mt2712
> which have 2 M4Us. In the other SoCs, we can get the larb-id from M4U
> in which the larbs in the "mediatek,larbs" always are ordered.
>
> CC: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c | 26 ++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> index 08cf40d..10e6493 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c
> @@ -67,7 +67,6 @@ struct mtk_smi_common_plat {
> };
>
> struct mtk_smi_larb_gen {
> - bool need_larbid;
> int port_in_larb[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX + 1];
> void (*config_port)(struct device *);
> unsigned int larb_direct_to_common_mask;
> @@ -153,18 +152,9 @@ void mtk_smi_larb_put(struct device *larbdev)
> struct mtk_smi_iommu *smi_iommu = data;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - if (larb->larb_gen->need_larbid) {
> - larb->mmu = &smi_iommu->larb_imu[larb->larbid].mmu;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * If there is no larbid property, Loop to find the corresponding
> - * iommu information.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < smi_iommu->larb_nr; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < MTK_LARB_NR_MAX; i++) {
Looks like this was the only use of mtk_smi_iommu.larb_nr. Should we
remove that now?
