On Thursday 20 March 2014, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > I don't even understand why you want to create a generic pci_address_to_pio > > implementation, when we don't need that for arm64 at all. Unless I'm > > missing something important, that function is only called in case of > > PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE with pci_of_scan on PowerPC. I don't expect any > > architecture to do the same thing, and the only other architecture that > > needs something like it (sparc) has a different implementation. > > Because in my [v7 2/6]* patch for the generic host bridge support I start > using pci_address_to_pio to fix the conversion of PCI ranges to resources. > That requires an arm64 (or more correctly, an arch with memory mapped IO > specific) version of pci_address_to_pio(). Yes, but why do you use it there? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
