Quoting Dmitry Torokhov (2019-01-23 14:05:45) > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 07:22:54AM +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Turns out this is not such a great idea. Once the SP clock is disabled, > > it's not sufficient to just enable in order to bring the SP core back up. > > > > It seems that the kernel has no business managing this clock. Just let > > the firmware keep it enabled. > > > > This reverts commit ed22cee91a88c47e564478b012fdbcb079653499. > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/154783267051.169631.3197836544646625747@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> > > OK, as clock folks say it is a bad idea it must be so. Merge though clk > tree? > > Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> > Ok sure. I'll merge them through clk tree. I'll fast track it through clk-fixes too.
