Hi Sebastian,
On 23/01/2019 at 19:34, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:42AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Add support for additional reset causes and the proper compatibility
>> string for sam9x60 SoC. The restart function is the same as the samx7.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> index f44a9ffcc2ab..44ca983a49a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> +++ b/drivers/power/reset/at91-reset.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ enum reset_type {
>> RESET_TYPE_WATCHDOG = 2,
>> RESET_TYPE_SOFTWARE = 3,
>> RESET_TYPE_USER = 4,
>> + RESET_TYPE_CPU_FAIL = 6,
>> + RESET_TYPE_XTAL_FAIL = 7,
>> + RESET_TYPE_ULP2 = 8,
>
> what happened to 5? :)
That a good question ;-)
It's marked as "Reserved"... which opens up a whole new field of
speculation :-)
[..]
>> { .compatible = "atmel,samx7-rstc", .data = samx7_restart },
>> + { .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rstc", .data = samx7_restart },
>> { /* sentinel */ }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, at91_reset_of_match);
>
> Patch looks fine to me. But I will wait a bit with merging, so that
> Alexandre or Ludovic have a chance to provide feedback.
What about merging this patch with the whole series through the at91
then arm-soc trees?
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
