On 1/22/19 11:48 AM, thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add the OCRAM ECC node following the Arria10 format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2 No changes
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> index 8253a1a9e985..a625dc472b91 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> @@ -494,6 +494,13 @@
> interrupts = <16 4>, <48 4>;
> };
>
> + ocram-ecc@ff8cc000 {
> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";
Are you absolutely sure there are no differences in the Stratix10 versus
A10? I wonder if it would be safer to have a platform specific binding
for Stratix10 rather than re-using A10. It would prevent from having to
change bindings later.
Dinh
