Hi Nicolin, On Vi, 2019-01-18 at 11:46 -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:16:24PM +0000, Viorel Suman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Moved "dais" node from machine driver DTS node to device > > > > driver > > > > DTS node > > > > as suggested by Rob. > > > That was not what I suggested. You still have a virtual node > > > which > > > looks to me to be unnecessary. > > To me removing virtual node implies that AUDMIX machine driver > > (imx- > > audmix.c + virtual node) shall be removed and machine driver code > > merged into device driver (fsl_audmix.c + device node) - please let > > me > > know if my understanding is wrong. > We could use a non-DT configuration right? From the driver logic, > DT just registers a device corresponding to the machine driver so > that it can probe(). We could register one in fsl_audmix instead. > Please refer to how fsl_ssi registers the sound card device. The > machine driver can get audmix_np from the parent device pointer, > and I think that's all you need. > > Or maybe someone else would provide a better way. But it'd work. Sent V4 - it implements the approach you suggested. Thank you for the hint, works well indeed. Regards, Viorel
