Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: Expand soc bus address range

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Stephen Boyd (2019-01-16 14:49:58)
> > > 
> > > Do we need #size-cells = <2>? Maybe it could be #size-cells = <1> and we
> > > can avoid having to specify a second size entry that's always going to
> > > be 0 because we don't have devices with huge IO regions in the SoC. Or
> > > does it need to be 2 for the large size of the size element of
> > > dma-ranges and ranges here? Looking at the code I think we can rely on
> > > the size-cells of the parent node so I think it will work with size of 1
> > > here.
> > > 
> > 
> > The "length" part of dma-ranges is described using #size-cells number of
> > cells, so with 1 there's no way we can describe this being 36 bits.
> 
> Yes, but doesn't the #size-cells of the parent node (i.e. root node in
> this case) dictate the number of cells of the "length" part of the
> dma-ranges property here? I hope that we don't need to push down the
> larger size of 2 just for this reason, but I admit I haven't run the
> code to understand this all properly.
> 

Ok, nevermind. I read the code more and looked at the spec and I'm just
talking nonsense on this point.





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux