Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2019-01-14 01:18:50) > Hi Stephen, > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2018-12-31 10:55:11) > > > Hello, > > > > > > This patchset adds common clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC of > > > the Owl family SoCs. This series is based on the initial work done > > > by Edgar Bernardi Righi. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10587527/ > > > > > > Since there isn't any update from him for long time, I took the liberty > > > to modify his patches, address review comments and send to list for review. > > > > > > This series has been tested on Allo Sparky SBC. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Mani > > > > > > Edgar Bernardi Righi (1): > > > dt-bindings: clock: Add DT bindings for Actions Semi S500 CMU > > > > > > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5): > > > clk: actions: Add configurable PLL delay > > > ARM: dts: Add CMU support for Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC > > > ARM: dts: Remove fake UART clock for S500 based SBCs > > > clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC > > > MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi > > > > What's the merge strategy for these patches? Some are for clk, others > > are for arm-soc, etc. I see a sandwich of patches too so it sounds like > > I can't even take just the clk ones for fear of breaking something that > > the dts bits in the middle clear out of the way. > > > > As we did with previous patchsets, clk patches will go through your tree > and I'll take the ARM/MAINTAINERS patches through Actions sub-tree. Let's > target these for 5.1. Even if your patches reach first, there won't be > any regression with existing DTS. > Ok. I have just minor nits. Please resend and I will merge the clk patches to clk tree.
