On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 08:11, Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > + ret = of_property_read_u32(priv->dev->of_node, "cmd-timeout-ms", > + &priv->cmd_timeout_ms); > + if (ret || priv->cmd_timeout_ms > PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_MAX || > + priv->cmd_timeout_ms == 0) { > + if (!ret) > + dev_warn(priv->dev, > + "Invalid cmd-timeout-ms : %u. Use default : %u\n", > + priv->cmd_timeout_ms, > + PECI_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS_DEFAULT); As this property is documented as optional, I'd split out the checks so you only warn when the value provided is invalid. > + > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, ASPEED_PECI_CTRL, > + FIELD_PREP(PECI_CTRL_CLK_DIV_MASK, PECI_CLK_DIV_DEFAULT) | > + PECI_CTRL_PECI_CLK_EN); > + > + /** Just the one *. > + * Timing negotiation period setting. > + * The unit of the programmed value is 4 times of PECI clock period. > + */ > + regmap_write(priv->regmap, ASPEED_PECI_TIMING, > + FIELD_PREP(PECI_TIMING_MESSAGE_MASK, msg_timing) | > + FIELD_PREP(PECI_TIMING_ADDRESS_MASK, addr_timing)); > +static int aspeed_peci_xfer(struct peci_adapter *adapter, > + struct peci_xfer_msg *msg) > +{ > + struct aspeed_peci *priv = peci_get_adapdata(adapter); > + > + return aspeed_peci_xfer_native(priv, msg); > +} It looks like you could do the peci_get_adapdata in aspeed_peci_xfer_native and drop the need for this wrapper. > + > +static int aspeed_peci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); > + base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); > + if (IS_ERR(base)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(base); > + goto err_put_adapter_dev; > + } > + > + priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, base, > + &aspeed_peci_regmap_config); > + if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap)) { > + ret = PTR_ERR(priv->regmap); > + goto err_put_adapter_dev; > + } > + > + /** > + * We check that the regmap works on this very first access, > + * but as this is an MMIO-backed regmap, subsequent regmap > + * access is not going to fail and we skip error checks from > + * this point. Why do you use a regmap for this driver? AFAICT it has exclusive ownership over the register range it uses, which is sometimes a reason to use a regmap over a mmio region. I'm not sure if you've ever disassembled drivers/base/regmap/regmap.o, but if you do you will find that a single mmio read turns into hundreds of instructions. Cheers, Joel