Hi Bin, On Thu, 2019-01-10 at 08:18 -0600, Bin Liu wrote: > Hi Min, > > Please briefly summarize the controller differences in the commit log, > such as > > - WIC interrupt registers; > - data toggle bit; > - no dedicated DMA interrupt line; > > so that we can quickly understand the core driver is modified > accordingly to handle the differences. Okay, tkanks. > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 03:24:22PM +0800, Min Guo wrote: > > Hi Bin, > > [snip] > > > > > > > + musb_writeb(mbase, MUSB_INTRUSB, > > > > > > + musb_readb(mbase, MUSB_INTRUSB)); > > > > > > > > > > For this clearing register bit operation, please create platform hooks > > > > > musb_clearb() and musb_clearw() in struct musb_platform_ops instead, > > > > > then follow how musb_readb() pointer is assigned in > > > > > musb_init_controller() to use the W1C version for mtk platform. > > > > > > > > I have tried implementing musb_readb(), musb_readw() interface with > > > > interrupt status W1C function in struct musb_platform_ops. But this > > > > interface will require a global variable to hold MAC basic address for > > > > judgment, and then special handling of the interrupt state. A global > > > > variable will make the driver work with only a single instance, so it > > > > can't work on some MTK platforms which have two instances. > > > > > > I didn't mean to modify musb_read*(), but > > > > > > > How about creating musb_clearb/w() as following: > > > > void (*clearb)(void __iomem *addr, unsigned offset, u8 data); > > > > void (*clearw)(void __iomem *addr, unsigned offset, u16 data); > > > > > > this is what I was asking for, similar to what musb_readb/w() is > > > implemented. > > > > I will prepare a patch for musb_clearb/w(). > > This doesn't have to be a separate patch. Okay. > > > > > > + musb_writew(mbase, MUSB_INTRRX, > > > > > > + musb_readw(mbase, MUSB_INTRRX)); > > > > > > + musb_writew(mbase, MUSB_INTRTX, > > > > > > + musb_readw(mbase, MUSB_INTRTX)); > > > > > > + } > > [snip] > > > > > > > + /* MediaTek controller has private toggle register */ > > > > > > > > > > only one toggle register for all endpoints? how does it handle > > > > > difference toggle values for different endpoints? > > > > > > > > MediaTek controller has separate registers to describe TX/RX toggle. > > > > > > Is it one register per endpoint? > > > > MUSB_RXTOG/MUSB_TXTOG is common register, each bit reflects the toggle > > state of an endpoint. bit[0] not used,bit[1~8] corresponds to ep[1~8] > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (musb->ops->quirks & MUSB_MTK_QUIRKS) { > > > > > > + u16 toggle; > > > > > > + u8 epnum = qh->hw_ep->epnum; > > > > > > + > > > > > > + if (is_in) > > > > > > + toggle = musb_readl(musb->mregs, MUSB_RXTOG); > > > > > > this line seems telling there is just *one* register for all endpoints. > > > > Yes, all endpoint share this register, endpoint and bit are one-to-one > > correspondence. > > Okay, thanks. Sorry I missed the bit operation in the code below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > should use musb_readw() instead? MUSB_RXTOG seems to be 16bit. > > > > > > > > Ok > > > > > > > > > > + else > > > > > > + toggle = musb_readl(musb->mregs, MUSB_TXTOG); > > > > > > + > > > > > > + csr = toggle & (1 << epnum); > > Regards, > -Bin.