On 10-Jan-19 5:37 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:44:03PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx> [190109 09:11]: >>> 8250_omap is DT only driver so dev->of_node always exists. Drop check >>> for existence of valid dev->of_node to simplify omap8250_probe(). >> >> That part seems safe to me now. >> >>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c >>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c >> ... >>> - const struct of_device_id *id; >>> - >>> - ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial"); >>> - >>> - of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-frequency", >>> - &up.port.uartclk); >>> - priv->wakeirq = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 1); >>> - >>> - id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(omap8250_dt_ids), &pdev->dev); >>> - if (id && id->data) >>> - priv->habit |= *(u8 *)id->data; >> >> But this part it seems we still need to keep around >> as we still have lots of clock-frequency references >> in the *.dtsi files. Or am I missing something? > > It's re-added a couple of lines later. Only the indent was removed. > That's right. You beat me to it. Thanks :) Regards Vignesh