Hi Tomi,
On Tuesday 18 March 2014 08:33:55 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 17/03/14 16:22, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> +Example
> >> +-------
> >> +
> >> +lcd0: display {
> >> + compatible = "tpo,taal", "panel-dsi-cm";
> >> + label = "lcd0";
> >> +
> >> + gpios = <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 102, reset */
> >
> > If the panel uses a TE GPIO but no reset GPIO, do you plan to express this
> > with a "hole" for the reset GPIO ? e.g. something like
> >
> > gpios = <0>, <&gpio4 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>
> Yes.
>
> > Wouldn't it be better to split the gpios property into "reset-gpios" and
> > "te- gpios" ?
>
> Yes, I can change it. I don't have a strong preference.
>
> I've gotten similar comments for other bindings also, so I guess the
> preferred way is to use named "-gpios" properties for everything except
> the case where you really have multiple gpios with the same purpose?
That's my understanding, yes.
> The gpio binding documentation doesn't give much guidance on this.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
