On Mon 2019-01-07 11:06:27, Frank Rowand wrote: > > + Frank > > On 1/7/19 10:37 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Is it "Device Tree" or "device tree"? > > > > pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "Device Tree" | wc -l > > 235 > > pavel@duo:/data/l/k/Documentation$ grep -r "device tree" | wc -l > > 595 > > > > I guess it would be nice to make it consistent. I guess "device tree" > > is preffered? > > > > Should we do something like this? > > Pavel > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt > > index 725fb8d..cc5f507 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/overlay-notes.txt > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ companion document to Documentation/devicetree/dynamic-resolution-notes.txt[1] > > How overlays work > > ----------------- > > > > -A Device Tree's overlay purpose is to modify the kernel's live tree, and > > +A device tree's overlay purpose is to modify the kernel's live tree, and > > have the modification affecting the state of the kernel in a way that > > is reflecting the changes. > > Since the kernel mainly deals with devices, any new device node that result > > > > Not a strong opinion, but I would prefer a third option of devicetree. That > makes it much easier to search for. That one is much less popular at the moment -- according to my searches... so it would be a bigger change. (Which I'll gladly support if I won't have to do the work... as long as it is consistent. But I believe that "device tree" is most common here, makes sense, and is easiest change, so...) Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
