On Tuesday 18 March 2014 16:40:17 Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> +
> +static void __iomem *ppebase;
The global 'ppebase' seems hacky. Isn't that a SoC-specific register area, while
the rest of the driver is reusable across SoCs?
What does 'ppe' stand for?
What if there are multiple instances of this, which each have their own ppebase?
> +static void hip04_config_port(struct hip04_priv *priv, u32 speed, u32 duplex)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + priv->speed = speed;
> + priv->duplex = duplex;
> +
> + switch (speed) {
> + case SPEED_1000:
> + val = 8;
> + break;
> + case SPEED_100:
> + if (priv->id)
> + val = 7;
> + else
> + val = 1;
> + break;
> + default:
> + val = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + writel_relaxed(val, priv->base + GE_PORT_MODE)
This also seems to encode knowledge about a particular implementation
into the driver. Maybe it's better to add a property for the port
mode?
> +static void hip04_set_xmit_desc(struct hip04_priv *priv, dma_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(phys, priv->base + PPE_CFG_TX_PKT_BD_ADDR);
> +}
> +
> +static void hip04_set_recv_desc(struct hip04_priv *priv, dma_addr_t phys)
> +{
> + writel_relaxed(phys, ppebase + priv->port * 4 + PPE_CFG_RX_CFF_ADDR);
> +}
> +
> +static u32 hip04_recv_cnt(struct hip04_priv *priv)
> +{
> + return readl_relaxed(priv->base + PPE_HIS_RX_PKT_CNT);
> +}
At the very least, the hip04_set_xmit_desc() function needs to use 'writel'
rather than 'writel_relaxed'. Otherwise data that is being sent out
can be stuck in the CPU's write buffers and you send stale data on the wire.
For the receive path, you may or may not need to use 'readl', depending
on how DMA is serialized by this device. If you have MSI interrupts, the
interrupt message should already do the serialization, but if you have
edge or level triggered interrupts, you normally need to have one readl()
from the device register between the IRQ and the data access.
> +static void endian_change(void *p, int size)
> +{
> + unsigned int *to_cover = (unsigned int *)p;
> + int i;
> +
> + size = size >> 2;
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++)
> + *(to_cover+i) = htonl(*(to_cover+i));
> +}
> +
> +static int hip04_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> +{
> + struct hip04_priv *priv = container_of(napi,
> + struct hip04_priv, napi);
> + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
> + struct sk_buff *skb;
> + struct rx_desc *desc;
> + unsigned char *buf;
> + int rx = 0;
> + unsigned int cnt = hip04_recv_cnt(priv);
> + unsigned int len, tmp[16];
> +
> + while (cnt) {
> + buf = priv->rx_buf[priv->rx_head];
> + skb = build_skb(buf, priv->rx_buf_size);
> + if (unlikely(!skb))
> + net_dbg_ratelimited("build_skb failed\n");
> + dma_map_single(&ndev->dev, skb->data,
> + RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
> + memcpy(tmp, skb->data, 64);
> + endian_change((void *)tmp, 64);
> + desc = (struct rx_desc *)tmp;
> + len = desc->pkt_len;
The dma_map_single() seems misplaced here, for all I can tell, the
data has already been transferred. Maybe you mean dma_unmap_single?
I don't see why you copy 64 bytes out of the buffer using endian_change,
rather than just looking at the first word, which seems to have the
only value you are interested in.
> + if (len > RX_BUF_SIZE)
> + len = RX_BUF_SIZE;
> + if (0 == len)
> + break;
> +
> + skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> + skb_put(skb, len);
> + skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, ndev);
> + napi_gro_receive(&priv->napi, skb);
> +
> + buf = netdev_alloc_frag(priv->rx_buf_size);
> + if (!buf)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + priv->rx_buf[priv->rx_head] = buf;
> + dma_map_single(&ndev->dev, buf, RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
Maybe you mean DMA_FROM_DEVICE? The call here doesn't seem to make any
sense. You also need to use the return value of dma_map_single() every
time you call it.
> + hip04_set_recv_desc(priv, virt_to_phys(buf));
and put it right here in the next line. virt_to_phys() is not the correct
function call, that is what dma_map_single() is meant for.
> + priv->rx_head = RX_NEXT(priv->rx_head);
> + if (rx++ >= budget)
> + break;
> +
> + if (--cnt == 0)
> + cnt = hip04_recv_cnt(priv);
> + }
> +
> + if (rx < budget) {
> + napi_gro_flush(napi, false);
> + __napi_complete(napi);
> + }
> +
> + /* enable rx interrupt */
> + priv->reg_inten |= RCV_INT | RCV_NOBUF;
> + writel_relaxed(priv->reg_inten, priv->base + PPE_INTEN);
Why do you unconditionally turn on interrupts here? Shouldn't you
only do that after calling napi_complete()?
> +
> +static int hip04_mac_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct hip04_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + struct tx_desc *desc = priv->td_ring[priv->tx_head];
> + unsigned int tx_head = priv->tx_head;
> + int ret;
> +
> + hip04_tx_reclaim(ndev, false);
> +
> + spin_lock_irq(&priv->txlock);
> + if (priv->tx_count++ >= TX_DESC_NUM) {
> + net_dbg_ratelimited("no TX space for packet\n");
> + netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> + ret = NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + priv->tx_skb[tx_head] = skb;
> + dma_map_single(&ndev->dev, skb->data, skb->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + memset((void *)desc, 0, sizeof(*desc));
> + desc->send_addr = (unsigned int)virt_to_phys(skb->data);
Just like above: you must not use virt_to_phys here, but rather use
the output of dma_map_single.
IIRC, you can't generally call dma_map_single() under a spinlock, so
better move that ahead. It may also be a slow operation.
> +
> +static int hip04_mac_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> +{
> + struct hip04_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + int i;
> +
> + hip04_reset_ppe(priv);
> + for (i = 0; i < RX_DESC_NUM; i++) {
> + dma_map_single(&ndev->dev, priv->rx_buf[i],
> + RX_BUF_SIZE, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + hip04_set_recv_desc(priv, virt_to_phys(priv->rx_buf[i]));
> + }
And one more. Also DMA_FROM_DEVICE.
> +static int hip04_alloc_ring(struct net_device *ndev, struct device *d)
> +{
> + struct hip04_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> + int i;
> +
> + priv->rx_buf_size = RX_BUF_SIZE +
> + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> +
> + priv->desc_pool = dma_pool_create(DRV_NAME, d, sizeof(struct tx_desc),
> + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct tx_desc)), 0);
> + if (!priv->desc_pool)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < TX_DESC_NUM; i++) {
> + priv->td_ring[i] = dma_pool_alloc(priv->desc_pool,
> + GFP_ATOMIC, &priv->td_phys[i]);
> + if (!priv->td_ring[i])
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Why do you create a dma pool here, when you do all the allocations upfront?
It looks to me like you could simply turn the td_ring array of pointers
to tx descriptors into a an array of tx descriptors (no pointers) and allocate
that one using dma_alloc_coherent.
> + if (!ppebase) {
> + struct device_node *n;
> +
> + n = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "hisilicon,hip04-ppebase");
> + if (!n) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + netdev_err(ndev, "not find hisilicon,ppebase\n");
> + goto init_fail;
> + }
> + ppebase = of_iomap(n, 0);
> + }
How about using syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() here? That way, you can have
a more generic abstraction of the ppe, and stick the port and id in there as
well, e.g.
ppe-syscon = <&hip04ppe 1 4>; // ppe, port, id
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "speed", &val);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_warn(d, "not find speed info\n");
> + priv->speed = SPEED_1000;
> + }
> +
> + if (SPEED_100 == val)
> + priv->speed = SPEED_100;
> + else
> + priv->speed = SPEED_1000;
> + priv->duplex = DUPLEX_FULL;
Why do you even need the speed here, shouldn't you get that information
from the phy through hip04_adjust_link?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
