On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 14:57 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Henry Chen (2019-01-02 06:09:54)
> > @@ -187,6 +190,18 @@ struct scp_soc_data {
> > bool bus_prot_reg_update;
> > };
> >
> > +BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(scpsys_notifier_list);
>
> static?
OK
>
> > +
> > +int register_scpsys_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > +{
> > + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&scpsys_notifier_list, nb);
> > +}
> > +
> > +int unregister_scpsys_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
> > +{
> > + return blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(&scpsys_notifier_list, nb);
> > +}
>
> What is the notifier for?
It used to notifier the DVFSRC driver that performance stat was changed.
>
> > +
> > static int scpsys_domain_is_on(struct scp_domain *scpd)
> > {
> > struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
> > @@ -536,6 +551,48 @@ static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk)
> > clk[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, clk_names[i]);
> > }
> >
> > +static int mtk_pd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> > + unsigned int state)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + struct scp_domain *scpd =
> > + container_of(genpd, struct scp_domain, genpd);
> > + struct scp_event_data scpe;
> > + struct scp *scp = scpd->scp;
> > + struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data = &scp->pd_data;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pd_data->num_domains; i++) {
> > + if (genpd == pd_data->domains[i]) {
> > + dev_dbg(scp->dev, "%d. %s = %d\n",
> > + i, genpd->name, state);
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + scpe.event_type = MTK_SCPSYS_PSTATE;
> > + scpe.genpd = genpd;
> > + scpe.domain_id = i;
> > + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&scpsys_notifier_list, state, &scpe);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned int mtk_pd_get_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> > + struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
> > +{
> > + struct device_node *np;
> > + unsigned int state;
> > +
> > + np = dev_pm_opp_get_of_node(opp);
> > +
> > + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "mtk,level", &state))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + of_node_put(np);
>
> The generic API that Rajendra is adding I guess will become even more
> generic by assuming some sort of property like 'opp-level' or
> 'performance-state' that is just some raw number.
ok, I will follow the new property from Rajendra.
> > +
> > + return state;
> > +}
> > +
> > static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > const struct scp_domain_data *scp_domain_data, int num,
> > const struct scp_ctrl_reg *scp_ctrl_reg,
