Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt/bindings: add bindings for optional optee rng-uuid property

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 7:40 AM Ard Biesheuvel
<ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Dec 2018 at 12:08, Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Add bindings for OP-TEE based optional hardware random number
> > generator identifier property. It could be used on ARM based devices
> > where entropy source is not accessible to normal world (linux in this
> > case).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
> > index d38834c..e3a4c35 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/firmware/linaro,optee-tz.txt
> > @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ the reference implementation maintained by Linaro.
> >                     "hvc" : HVC #0, with the register assignments specified
> >                            in drivers/tee/optee/optee_smc.h
> >
> > +- rng-uuid       : Optional OP-TEE based RNG service identifier in case
> > +                   hardware entropy source is not accesible to normal world
> > +                   (Linux).
> >
> >
> >  Example:
> > @@ -27,5 +30,6 @@ Example:
> >                 optee {
> >                         compatible = "linaro,optee-tz";
> >                         method = "smc";
> > +                       rng-uuid = "ab7a617c-b8e7-4d8f-8301-d09b61036b64";
>
> If OP-TEE is going to expose devices in this way, it should be modeled
> more like a bus driver, i.e., sub-nodes that represent the devices,
> with compatible strings, and perhaps even 'reg' properties for the
> UUIDs.

Please, no. We have DT for things that are not discoverable. Make
OP-TEE services/devices discoverable. We only need the OP-TEE node in
the first place because sub-functions of the SMC-CC itself isn't
discoverable. I suppose there could be some need to expose providers
to consumer nodes in DT, but that's not the case here.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux