On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:30 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [181222 20:54]: > > I noticed for your patch, I noticed you listed both the IRQ, gpio 149 > > as well as uart1_rts. Looking at the device tree, I see that > > uart1_rts is configured as gpio 149. > > The uart1_rts is just the pad name used in the TRM, so it should > probably say uart1_rts.gpio_149 meaning pad uart1_rts is muxed to > gpio_149. > > Would that clear the issue for you? That part I understand. I poorly phrased my question. What was mostly confusing to me is why both irq and wakeup interrupts are needed since it seems like <&gpio5 21 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, and <&omap3_pmx_core 0x14e>; point to the same pin. Or did I mis-interpret the datasheet again? :-) adam > > > I did a quick scan of other > > boards, I haven't noticed other boards listing the same gpio twice, > > once under IRQ and once under the pmx_core wakeup. Is that something > > we should do on other boards, or is that something unique to the > > omap3-evm? > > No just trying to come up with some some less confusing comments, > but obviously that did not work so far :) > > Regards, > > Tony
