Re: [PATCH v4 08/18] iommu/mediatek: Add larb-id remapped support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Nicolas,

Thanks for the review of this patchset.

On Fri, 2018-12-21 at 11:35 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 4:42 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The larb-id may be remapped in the smi-common, this means the
> > larb-id reported in the mtk_iommu_isr isn't the real larb-id,
> >
> > Take mt8183 as a example:
> >                        M4U
> >                         |
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > |               SMI common                  |
> > -0-----7-----5-----6-----1-----2------3-----4- <- Id remapped
> >  |     |     |     |     |     |      |     |
> > larb0 larb1 IPU0  IPU1 larb4 larb5  larb6  CCU
> > disp  vdec  img   cam   venc  img    cam
> > As above, larb0 connects with the id 0 in smi-common.
> >           larb1 connects with the id 7 in smi-common.
> >           ...
> > If the larb-id reported in the isr is 7, actually it's larb1(vdec).
> > In order to output the right larb-id in the isr, we add a larb-id
> > remapping relationship in this patch.
> >
> > This also is a preparing patch for mt8183.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 3 +++
> >  drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 4 ++++
> >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index eda062a..8ab3b69 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -220,6 +220,9 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_iommu_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >         fault_larb = F_MMU0_INT_ID_LARB_ID(regval);
> >         fault_port = F_MMU0_INT_ID_PORT_ID(regval);
> >
> > +       if (data->plat_data->larbid_remap_enable)
> > +               fault_larb = data->plat_data->larbid_remapped[fault_larb];
> > +
> >         if (report_iommu_fault(&dom->domain, data->dev, fault_iova,
> >                                write ? IOMMU_FAULT_WRITE : IOMMU_FAULT_READ)) {
> >                 dev_err_ratelimited(
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > index b8749ac..3877050 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ struct mtk_iommu_plat_data {
> >
> >         /* HW will use the EMI clock if there isn't the "bclk". */
> >         bool                has_bclk;
> > +
> > +       /* The larb-id may be remapped in the smi-common. */
> > +       bool                larbid_remap_enable;
> > +       unsigned int        larbid_remapped[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX];
> 
> Wouldn't it be a little simpler if you just had
> larbid_remap[MTK_LARB_NR_MAX] (no larbid_remap_enable), and just set
> it to {0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} in platforms that don't need
> complicated remapping?

Actually I'd like the original way(Print the larb-id from the register
directly if larb-id is not remapped). But this solution is also ok for
me.

> 
> Also, unsigned char/u8 array would be enough.

OK. "unsigned char" is enough.
Originally I think "int" or "long" may be better to access in ARM/ARM64.

> 
> >  };
> >
> >  struct mtk_iommu_domain;
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux