On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:05:27PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 05:38:08PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday 14 March 2014, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:34:18PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote: > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c > > > [...] > > > > +int pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t address, resource_size_t size) > > > [...] > > > > +unsigned long pci_address_to_pio(phys_addr_t address) > > > [...] > > > > +void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > > > [ actually most of this file ] > > > > > > Maybe it was raised before already but can we have __weak generic > > > definitions of these functions? They don't seem to be arm64 specific in > > > any way. [...] > Catalin, if you are happy to ask for ACKs from all arch maintainers that might get > affected by our custom version of pci_address_to_pio() before you can pull PCI support > for arm64 then I can propose a new patchset. You don't need to change the other architectures, that's the point of a __weak definition, it will be automatically overridden. If you want, you can even place a GENERIC_PCI or whatever config option that is only selected by arm64 for the time being. -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
