On 18-12-18, 11:05, Doug Anderson wrote: > OK, it's fine with me to have the fallback, but if we do we should be > consistent about it and make sure it's in all the bindings and device > tree files... Sure. I am not sure what's the right way to do it is, i.e. should we keep the "operating-points-v2" string or not. Another example I see is (which can be compared here) is the board specific DT files. Normally the root node's compatible is a long list of strings like: compatible = "nvidia,p2371-2180", "nvidia,p2180", "nvidia,tegra210"; which starts from platform-specific string, then mach, then board, etc.. We do keep all of them in those cases and that makes me wonder why the same shouldn't be done for OPP bindings. -- viresh
