On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:42:17AM +0000, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> On 12.12.2018 09:01, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 01:41:31PM +0000, Vokáč Michal wrote:
> >> Normally the PWM output is held LOW when PWM is disabled. This can cause
> >> problems when inverted PWM signal polarity is needed. With this behavior
> >> the connected circuit is fed by 100% duty cycle instead of being shut-off.
> >>
> >> Allow users to define a "pwm" and a "gpio" pinctrl states. The pwm pinctrl
> >> state is selected when PWM is enabled and the gpio pinctrl state is
> >> selected when PWM is disabled. In the gpio state the new pwm-gpios GPIO is
> >> configured as input and the internal pull-up resistor is used to pull the
> >> output level high.
> >>
> >> If all the pinctrl states and the pwm-gpios GPIO are not correctly
> >> specified in DT the PWM work as usual.
> >>
> >> As an example, with this patch a PWM controlled backlight with inversed
> >> signal polarity can be used in full brightness range. Without this patch
> >> the backlight can not be turned off as brightness = 0 disables the PWM
> >> and that in turn set PWM output LOW, that is full brightness.
> >>
> >> Inverted output of the PWM with "default" and with "pwm"+"gpio" pinctrl:
> >>
> >> +--------------+------------+---------------+----------- +-------------+
> >> | After reset | Bootloader | PWM probe | PWM | PWM |
> >> | 100k pull-up | | | enable 30% | disable |
> >> +--------------+------------+---------------+------------+-------------+
> >> | pinctrl | none | default | default | default |
> >> | out H __________________ __ __ |
> >> | out L \_________________/ \_/ \_/\____________ |
> >> | ^ ^ ^ |
> >> +--------------+------------+---------------+------------+-------------+
> >> | pinctrl | none | gpio | pwm | gpio |
> >> | out H __________________________________ __ __ _____________ |
> >> | out L \_/ \_/ \_/ |
> >> | ^ ^ ^ |
> >> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Changes in v3:
> >> - Commit message update.
> >> - Minor fix in code comment (Uwe)
> >> - Align function arguments to the opening parentheses. (Uwe)
> >> - Do not test devm_pinctrl_get for NULL. (Thierry)
> >> - Convert all messages to dev_dbg() (Thierry)
> >> - Do not actively drive the pin in gpio state. Configure it as input
> >> and rely solely on the internal pull-up. (Thierry)
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >> - Utilize the "pwm" and "gpio" pinctrl states.
> >> - Use the pwm-gpios signal to drive the output in "gpio" pinctrl state.
> >> - Select the right pinctrl state in probe.
> >>
> >> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
> >>
>
> [ snip ]
>
> > On thing I noticed while looking at the rcar driver is: This doesn't
> > wait for the current period to end. Is this supposed to happen? Also for
> > the enable case the hardware is configured for the desired duty cycle
> > and only then the pinctrl is switched to pwm. Both might result in a
> > spike that is not desired.
>
> The behavior should not change from how imx-pwm was working before.
> When PWM is disabled the output is immediately gated off (put into
> the idle state) independently on the period. I measured this.
Oh really, I wasn't aware of that. This is another bug in the imx pwm
then (I think).
> For the enable case you would certainly not get any additional spikes.
Yes, there is a possibility for a spike: If you configure for say 40%:
_ _
pwm output : ___/ \__/ \__
muxing : GPIO| PWM_
actual output: ____/\__/ \__
> The worst thing that may happen is that the first period will be
> slightly shorter depending on how long it takes to test the pinctrl
> and switch the muxing. And this is unavoidable, it would happen even
> if you wait for the start of a period. The test + muxing still takes
> some time.
You could first configure for duty_cycle 0 and a short period, then mux
to PWM and then configure the correct duty cycle. Ditto for disable.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
