Re: [PATCH v4 2/6] arm64: add basic DTS for i.MX8MQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Hi Abel,
> 
> Am Freitag, den 07.12.2018, 16:17 +0000 schrieb Abel Vesa:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 05:25:24PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > 
> > > > +
> > > > +	clk_ext1: clock-ext1 {
> > > > +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > > +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> > > > +		clock-frequency = <133000000>;
> > > > +		clock-output-names = "clk_ext1";
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	clk_ext2: clock-ext2 {
> > > > +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > > +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> > > > +		clock-frequency = <133000000>;
> > > > +		clock-output-names = "clk_ext2";
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	clk_ext3: clock-ext3 {
> > > > +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > > +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> > > > +		clock-frequency = <133000000>;
> > > > +		clock-output-names = "clk_ext3";
> > > > +	};
> > > > +
> > > > +	clk_ext4: clock-ext4 {
> > > > +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > > > +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> > > > +		clock-frequency= <133000000>;
> > > > +		clock-output-names = "clk_ext4";
> > > > +	};
> > > 
> > > This is really 4 independent clocks or is 1 clock connected to 4
> > > sinks?
> > 
> > According to the RM, yes, there are 4 independent clocks. Here is a
> > link to the rm:
> > 
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nxp.com%2Fwebapp%2FDownload%3FcolCode%3DIMX8MEVKBHUG&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7C303f3053feb94a3c1c9f08d65c623255%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636797974154936811&amp;sdata=CuJSqDl1WiL%2Bc%2B4wYnr3ssDDpH3DorYIzLN87PNHVh4%3D&amp;reserved=0 (page 829)
> > 
> > Unfortunately, the old link (which worked without login) does not
> > work anymore.
> 
> It's really 4 clock inputs to the SoC, but they may actually be
> connected to the same clock source on the board. So I really wonder if
> we should even put this into the base SoC DT, but rather push this into
> individual board DTs.

Hmm, it's part of the SoC, right ? So I would keep it in the dtsi rather than
having it duplicated into every new dts.

> 
> Regards,
> Lucas

-- 



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux