Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Introduce STPMIC1 PMIC Driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 04 Dec 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:
> Le 12/03/2018 08:11 AM, Lee Jones a écrit :
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:
> >
> >> The goal of this patch-set is to propose a driver for the STPMIC1 PMIC from
> >> STMicroelectronics.
> >> The STPMIC1 regulators supply power to an application processor as well as
> >> to external system peripherals such as DDR, Flash memories and system
> >> devices. It also features onkey button input and an hardware watchdog.
> >> The STPMIC1 is controlled via I2C.
> >>
> >> Main driver is drivers/mfd/stpmic1 that handle I2C regmap configuration and
> >> irqchip. stpmic1_regulator, stpmic1_onkey and stpmic1_wdt need stpmic1 mfd
> >> as parent.
> >>
> >> STPMIC1 MFD and regulator drivers maybe mandatory at boot time.
> >>
> >> Pascal Paillet (7):
> >> changes in v7:
> >> * rebase on regul/for-next
> >>
> >>    dt-bindings: mfd: document stpmic1
> >>    mfd: stpmic1: add stpmic1 driver
> >>    dt-bindings: input: document stpmic1 pmic onkey
> >>    input: stpmic1: add stpmic1 onkey driver
> >>    dt-bindings: watchdog: document stpmic1 pmic watchdog
> >>    watchdog: stpmic1: add stpmic1 watchdog driver
> >>    regulator: stpmic1: fix regulator_lock usage
> >>
> >>   .../devicetree/bindings/input/st,stpmic1-onkey.txt |  28 +++
> >>   .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/st,stpmic1.txt         |  61 ++++++
> >>   .../bindings/watchdog/st,stpmic1-wdt.txt           |  11 ++
> >>   drivers/input/misc/Kconfig                         |  11 ++
> >>   drivers/input/misc/Makefile                        |   2 +
> >>   drivers/input/misc/stpmic1_onkey.c                 | 198 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/mfd/Kconfig                                |  16 ++
> >>   drivers/mfd/Makefile                               |   1 +
> >>   drivers/mfd/stpmic1.c                              | 213 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/regulator/stpmic1_regulator.c              |   2 +-
> > Is it just Mark you're waiting on now?
> It is ok now, Mark has applied the patch.
> Evrey thing has been acked now. What is the nex step ?

Mark has applied patch 7?

Why don't I see that?  Should you have removed it from this set?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux