Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations
for the node names:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the
name should be one of the following choices:
...
interrupt-controller"
Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
index 5b7bef684256..6f35bab10e9d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
<GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
};
- gic: gic@f0100000 {
+ gic: interrupt-controller@f0100000 {
compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
reg = <0x0 0xf0200000 0x0 0x10000>, /* GIC Dist */
<0x0 0xf0280000 0x0 0x200000>, /* GICR */
--
2.17.1
