Harmless mistake, but it's incorrect. The DT spec provides recommendations
for the node names:
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming model. If appropriate, the
name should be one of the following choices:
...
interrupt-controller"
Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
index 085bbd33eadc..3a17ab4e7c2f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ox820.dtsi
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@
clocks = <&armclk>;
};
- gic: gic@1000 {
+ gic: interrupt-controller@1000 {
compatible = "arm,arm11mp-gic";
interrupt-controller;
#interrupt-cells = <3>;
--
2.17.1
