Re: [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/26/2018 11:33 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:


On 11/24/2018 12:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:32:24PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Will,

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:09 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
From: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
separately.
Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.

Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Given that you're doing the get/put in the TLBI ops unconditionally:

  static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
  {
       struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;

-     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
+     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
+             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_flush_all(smmu_domain);
+             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
+     }
  }

  static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
  {
       struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
+     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;

-     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
+     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
+             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync(smmu_domain);
+             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
+     }
Why do you need them around the map/unmap calls as well?
We still have .tlb_add_flush path?
Ok, so we could add the ops around that as well. Right now, we've got
the runtime pm hooks crossing two parts of the API.

Sure, will do that then, and remove the runtime pm hooks from map/unmap.

I missed this earlier -
We are adding runtime pm hooks in the 'iommu_ops' callbacks and not really to
'tlb_ops'. So how the runtime pm hooks crossing the paths?
'.map/.unmap' iommu_ops don't call '.flush_iotlb_all' or '.iotlb_sync' iommu_ops
anywhere.

E.g., only callers to domain->ops->flush_iotlb_all() are:
iommu_dma_flush_iotlb_all(), or iommu_flush_tlb_all() which are not in map/unmap paths.

Regards
Vivek


Thanks
Vivek

Will





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux