Hi Thor, On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:57:00PM -0500, thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Currently the clocks are specified in a structure as well as > in the device tree. Since all the information about clocks can be > pulled from the device tree, parse the device tree for the clock > information if specified. > > This patch is dependent upon the following patch series that > adds clocks to the driver. > "[v16,0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support" > https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10581891/ > > particularly this patch which adds the clocks: > "[v16,1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops" > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10581899/ > > Request testing on different platforms for verification. > This patch was tested on a Stratix10 SOCFPGA. > > Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <thor.thayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v4 Change dependency on pending patch series that adds clocks. > Add code for parsing device tree for the clocks. > v3 Change dependency on device tree bulk clock patches. > v2 Add structure for SOCFPGA and add dependency on clock patch. > --- > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > index d315ca637097..3dd10663b09c 100644 > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ > #include <linux/module.h> > #include <linux/of.h> > #include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_clk.h> > #include <linux/of_device.h> > #include <linux/of_iommu.h> > #include <linux/pci.h> > @@ -2139,6 +2140,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > const struct arm_smmu_match_data *data; > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > bool legacy_binding; > + const char **parent_names; > > if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#global-interrupts", > &smmu->num_global_irqs)) { > @@ -2149,9 +2151,25 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > data = of_device_get_match_data(dev); > smmu->version = data->version; > smmu->model = data->model; > - smmu->num_clks = data->num_clks; > - > - arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(smmu, data->clks); > + smmu->num_clks = of_clk_get_parent_count(dev->of_node); > + /* check to see if clocks were specified in DT */ > + if (smmu->num_clks) { > + unsigned int i; > + > + parent_names = kmalloc_array(smmu->num_clks, > + sizeof(*parent_names), > + GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!parent_names) > + goto fail_clk_name; > + > + for (i = 0; i < smmu->num_clks; i++) { > + if (of_property_read_string_index(dev->of_node, > + "clock-names", i, > + &parent_names[i])) > + goto fail_clk_name; > + } > + arm_smmu_fill_clk_data(smmu, parent_names); > + } > > parse_driver_options(smmu); > > @@ -2171,6 +2189,12 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev, > smmu->features |= ARM_SMMU_FEAT_COHERENT_WALK; > > return 0; > + > +fail_clk_name: > + kfree(parent_names); > + /* clock-names required for clocks in devm_clk_bulk_get() */ > + dev_err(dev, "Error: clock-name required in device tree\n"); I think you can drop the "Error: " prefix here, but the rest of the patch looks sensible to me. We just need to work out how this co-exists with Vivek's approach of using match_data (see the other thread). Will
