[+Thor]
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:30PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> qcom,smmu-v2 is an arm,smmu-v2 implementation with specific
> clock and power requirements.
> On msm8996, multiple cores, viz. mdss, video, etc. use this
> smmu. On sdm845, this smmu is used with gpu.
> Add bindings for the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 2098c3141f5f..d315ca637097 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ enum arm_smmu_implementation {
> GENERIC_SMMU,
> ARM_MMU500,
> CAVIUM_SMMUV2,
> + QCOM_SMMUV2,
> };
>
> struct arm_smmu_s2cr {
> @@ -2026,6 +2027,17 @@ ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu401, ARM_SMMU_V1_64K, GENERIC_SMMU);
> ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(arm_mmu500, ARM_SMMU_V2, ARM_MMU500);
> ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(cavium_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, CAVIUM_SMMUV2);
>
> +static const char * const qcom_smmuv2_clks[] = {
> + "bus", "iface",
> +};
> +
> +static const struct arm_smmu_match_data qcom_smmuv2 = {
> + .version = ARM_SMMU_V2,
> + .model = QCOM_SMMUV2,
> + .clks = qcom_smmuv2_clks,
> + .num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(qcom_smmuv2_clks),
> +};
These seems redundant if we go down the route proposed by Thor, where we
just pull all of the clocks out of the device-tree. In which case, why
do we need this match_data at all?
Will
