On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:39 AM Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On 17 November 2018 14:33 Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:09:09PM +0000, Phil Edworthy wrote: > > > Add device binding documentation for the Renesas RZ/N1 GPIO interrupt > > > multiplexer. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edworthy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v3: > > > - Use 'interrupt-map' DT property correctly. > > > v2: > > > - Use interrupt-map to allow the GPIO controller info to be specified > > > as part of the irq. > > > - Don't show status in binding examples. > > > - Don't show the soc/board split in binding doc. > > > --- > > > .../interrupt-controller/renesas,rzn1-mux.txt | 73 > > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzn1-mu > > > x.txt > > > > A few nits, otherwise: > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks for the review! > > > > > > > diff --git > > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzn1- > > > mux.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,rzn1- > > > mux.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..6515880e25cc > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/renesas,r > > > +++ zn1-mux.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > > > +* Renesas RZ/N1 GPIO Interrupt Multiplexer > > > + > > > +On Renesas RZ/N1 devices, there are several GPIO Controllers each > > > +with a number of interrupt outputs. All of the interrupts from the > > > +GPIO Controllers are passed to the GPIO Interrupt Multiplexer, which > > > +selects a sub-set of the interrupts to pass onto the system interrupt > > controller. > > > + > > > +A single node in the device tree is used to describe the GPIO IRQ Muxer. > > > + > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible: SoC-specific compatible string "renesas,<soc-specific>- > > gpioirqmux" > > > + followed by "renesas,rzn1-gpioirqmux" as fallback. The SoC-specific > > > +compatible > > > + strings must be one of: > > > + "renesas,r9a06g032-gpioirqmux" for RZ/N1D > > > + "renesas,r9a06g033-gpioirqmux" for RZ/N1S > > > +- reg: Base address and size of GPIO IRQ Muxer registers. > > > +- interrupts: List of output interrupts. > > > +- #interrupt-cells: Numder of cells in the input interrupt specifier, must be > > 1. > > > +- #address-cells: Must be 0. > > > +- interrupt-map-mask: must be 127. > > > +- interrupt-map: Standard property detailing the maps between input > > > +irqs and the > > > + corresponding output irq. This consist of a list of: > > > + <input-irq-spec phandle-to-interrupt-controller output-irq-spec> > > > + The input-irq-spec is from 0 to 95, corresponding to the outputs of > > > +the GPIO > > > + Controllers. > > > + > > > +Example: > > > + > > > + The following is an example for the RZ/N1D SoC. > > > + > > > + gpioirqmux: gpioirqmux@51000480 { > > > > interrupt-controller@... > Sure > > > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a06g032-gpioirqmux", > > > + "renesas,rzn1-gpioirqmux"; > > > + reg = <0x51000480 0x20>; > > > + interrupts = > > > + <GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > > + <GIC_SPI 104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > > > This is a bit redundant as the same information is in interrupt-map, but I > > guess you need it to get the irq resources. > That's right. > > > > + > > > + #interrupt-cells = <1>; > > > + #address-cells = <0>; > > > + interrupt-map-mask = <127>; > > > > Use hex for masks. > Ok. > > > > + interrupt-map = > > > + /* gpio2a 24, pin 146: ETH Port 1 IRQ */ > > > + <88 &gic GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > > > + /* gpio2a 26, pin 148: TouchSCRN_IRQ */ > > > + <90 &gic GIC_SPI 104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > > + }; > > > + > > > + gpio2: gpio@5000d000 { > > > + compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio"; > > > + reg = <0x5000d000 0x80>; > > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > > + clock-names = "bus"; > > > + clocks = <&sysctrl R9A06G032_HCLK_GPIO2>; > > > + > > > + gpio2a: gpio-controller@0 { > > > > gpio@0 > Are you sure about this? Yes, 'gpio' is what the DT spec says. It is the oddball though and I always have to think about it. > The bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/snps-dwapb-gpio.txt > show an example where the sub-nodes for gpio banks are gpio-controller@. > This is also in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio.txt. Indeed. Those should be fixed. I would be easily persuaded to just change the spec, but 'gpio@' is much more widely used: $ git grep gpio@ -- arch/ | wc 1110 4378 67766 $ git grep gpio-controller@ -- arch/ | wc 60 232 4270 Rob