On 11/19/2018 10:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek, Wolfram,
Hi,
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 12:46 AM Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2018 12:14 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 06:30:56PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> Document the support for rcar_can on R8A77990 SoC devices.
>>>> Add R8A77990 to the list of SoCs which require the "assigned-clocks"
>>>> and "assigned-clock-rates" properties.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/rcar_can.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/rcar_can.txt
>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ Required properties:
>>>> "renesas,can-r8a7795" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7795 SoC.
>>>> "renesas,can-r8a7796" if CAN controller is a part of R8A7796 SoC.
>>>> "renesas,can-r8a77965" if CAN controller is a part of R8A77965 SoC.
>>>
>>> I was wondering why you didn't have a patch adding support for R8A77965.
>>> I see it is already added here but can't find a tree where this line
>>> exists (no linus/master or renesas-drivers/master). Did you maybe forgot
>>> to send out a patch?
>>
>> Try and grep for 'renesas,rcar-gen3-can' , the drivers are in
>> drivers/net/can/rcar/ . They both match on the generic compatible.
>
> Marek: I think you misunderstood Wolfram's question.
> He asked about the DT bindings, not about the driver.
Ha, yes, I think I did.
> Wolfram: Eugenu's commit 4f145f14f6b98b5a ("dt-bindings: can:
> rcar_can: document r8a77965 support") is in next as of next-20181115 .
> However, it's not part of linux-can-next. Seems to be destined for v4.20 as
> a fix.
I'm always building on top of next, so that's why I didn't quite
understand the question.
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
