On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 12:25:41PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 06:06:21PM +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > On some chips the PCIE and PCIE_PHY blocks are in separate power domains > > which can be power-gated independently. The pci driver needs to handle > > this by keeping both domain active. > > > > This is intended for imx6sx where PCIE is in DISPLAY and PCIE_PHY in > > it's own domain. Defining the DISPLAY domain requires a way for pcie to > > keep it active or it will break when displays are off. > > > > The power-domains on imx6sx are meant to look like this: > > power-domains = <&pd_disp>, <&pd_pci>; > > power-domain-names = "pcie", "pcie_phy"; > > > > Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@xxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > I expect Shawn to pick the whole series up and therefore I am dropping > this series from the PCI tree. Lorenzo, I think the best approach is that you send patch #2 and #3 for 4.21 through PCI tree, and we will be able to apply patch #4 in 4.22 development cycle. Queuing patch #3 on IMX tree will stands a good chance for conflicts with other pci-imx6.c changes on PCI tree. Shawn
