On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 12:32:50PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 11/6/18 6:06 AM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 02:54:25PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Changes in v4: > >> > >> - dropped initrd_below_start_ok assignment in ARM64, not necessary at > >> all (Ard) > >> - replace #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD with if > >> (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) for consistency with other parts > >> of arm64_memblock_init() (Rob) > >> > >> Changes in v3: > >> > >> - use C conditionals in drivers/of/fdt.c > >> - added check on phys_initrd_size in arch/arm64/mm/init.c to determine > >> whether initrd_start must be populated > >> - fixed a build warning with ARC that was just missing an (unsigned > >> long) cast > >> > >> Changes in v2: > >> > >> - get rid of ARCH_HAS_PHYS_INITRD and instead define > >> phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size in init/do_mounts_initrd.c > >> > >> - make __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() account for ARM64 specific > >> behavior with __va() when having CONFIG_DEBUG_VM enabled > >> > >> - consolidate early_initrd() command line parsing into > >> init/do_mounts_initrd.c > >> > >> Because phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size are now compiled in > >> ini/do_mounts_initrd.c which is only built with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y, > >> we need to be a bit careful about the uses throughout architecture > >> specific code. > >> > >> Previous discussions/submissions list here: > >> > >> v3: > >> https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg683566.html > >> v2: > >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/25/4 > >> > >> Florian Fainelli (6): > >> nds32: Remove phys_initrd_start and phys_initrd_size > >> arch: Make phys_initrd_start and phys_initrd_size global variables > >> of/fdt: Populate phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size from FDT > >> arm64: Utilize phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size > >> of/fdt: Remove custom __early_init_dt_declare_initrd() implementation > >> arch: Move initrd= parsing into do_mounts_initrd.c > > > > For the series: > > > > Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Thanks Mike, Rob, do you want to merge that series through the OF tree? Sure, some arch maintainer acks would be nice. Rob
