On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 20:07:02 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 19:27:42 +0100 > > Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:38:59 +0100 > > > > Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Introduce i2c controller support to st_lsm6dsx driver for lsm6dso sensor. > > > > > Add register map for lis2mdl magnetometer sensor. > > > > > Add hw FIFO support to st_lsm6dsx sensorhub driver. > > > > > > > > > > Lorenzo Bianconi (7): > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: introduce locked read/write utility routines > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: reboot memory content after reset > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: remove static from st_lsm6dsx_set_watermark > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: introduce ST_LSM6DSX_ID_EXT sensor ids > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add i2c embedded controller support > > > > > iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add hw FIFO support to i2c controller > > > > > dt-bindings: iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: add support to i2c pullup resistors > > > > > > > > > > .../bindings/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx.txt | 1 + > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/Makefile | 3 +- > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx.h | 167 +++- > > > > > .../iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_buffer.c | 169 ++-- > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 273 +++++-- > > > > > drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c | 753 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > .../linux/platform_data/st_sensors_pdata.h | 2 + > > > > > 7 files changed, 1226 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-) > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_shub.c > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Lorenzo, > > > > > > > > Great to see this series. > > > > > > Hi Jonathan, > > > > > > thx a lot for the fast review :) I will fix your comments in a v2 > > > > > > > > > > > It seems to have come together fairly nicely given the inherent complexity > > > > of dealing with these slave i2c controllers. What I would like to > > > > see in this cover letter though is a brief description of what can be > > > > put behind these devices? > > > > > > > > The one thing I want to be careful of is ending up with lots of sort > > > > of replicated drivers where we have a version in each sensor hub > > > > and one for directly connected devices. Superficially this > > > > device seems to have a very restricted I2C master so that might not > > > > be a significant problem. What do you think? > > > > This gets particularly interesting if we think about switching in > > > > and out of pass through. At that point this looks like an i2c offload > > > > engine (sort of) similar to the one Lars did for spi, be it a very > > > > restricted one. > > > > > > I think the main purpose of the i2c controller embedded in lsm6dso is > > > to connect a magnetometer sensor > > > to it and get in this way a 9axis device (please note this is just my opinion). > > > However we can think to connect other devices like temperature or > > > pressure sensors (I tested them in the past :)). > > > I think we will never use it as a 'general purpose' contoller, e.g. to > > > connect an adc :) > > > > Hmm. Lets keep an eye on what gets added. If it gets silly we can revisit how > > to handle things. Particularly if we get things that can't be so easily > > probed. Of course, we may find no one ever adds anything else and that > > would be fine :) > > > > Do you have something to point out? Nothing in particular. > Maybe a future improvement can be a more general way to pass > slave register map. What do you think? Possibly true. These sort of 'half implementations' of an i2c master with offload are getting more common so we may need to look at this in detail. Jonathan > > Regards, > Lorenzo > > > Jonathan > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lorenzo > > > > > > > > > > > Jonathan > >
