From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx> One accessor of overlays[] was using a hard coded index value to find the correct array entry instead of searching for the entry containing the correct name. Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx> --- drivers/of/unittest.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c index d625a91a7f60..fe01c5869b0f 100644 --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c @@ -2192,7 +2192,7 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_phandle); OVERLAY_INFO_EXTERN(overlay_bad_symbol); -/* order of entries is hard-coded into users of overlays[] */ +/* entries found by name */ static struct overlay_info overlays[] = { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_base, -9999), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay, 0), @@ -2215,7 +2215,8 @@ struct overlay_info { OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_add_dup_prop, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_phandle, -EINVAL), OVERLAY_INFO(overlay_bad_symbol, -EINVAL), - {} + /* end marker */ + {.dtb_begin = NULL, .dtb_end = NULL, .expected_result = 0, .name = NULL} }; static struct device_node *overlay_base_root; @@ -2245,6 +2246,19 @@ void __init unittest_unflatten_overlay_base(void) u32 data_size; void *new_fdt; u32 size; + int found = 0; + const char *overlay_name = "overlay_base"; + + for (info = overlays; info && info->name; info++) { + if (!strcmp(overlay_name, info->name)) { + found = 1; + break; + } + } + if (!found) { + pr_err("no overlay data for %s\n", overlay_name); + return; + } info = &overlays[0]; @@ -2292,11 +2306,10 @@ static int __init overlay_data_apply(const char *overlay_name, int *overlay_id) { struct overlay_info *info; int found = 0; - int k; int ret; u32 size; - for (k = 0, info = overlays; info && info->name; info++, k++) { + for (info = overlays; info && info->name; info++) { if (!strcmp(overlay_name, info->name)) { found = 1; break; -- Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>