Hi Mark, Jyri
> > Since RFC:
> > - fixed commit msg typo
> > - added include/sound/soc.h changes too
> >
> > The sematics of bitclock-master and frame-master DT parameters
> > should depend on whether they are found from a cpu-dai or codec
> > sub-node.
> >
> > - bitclock-master in cpu-dai node means Codec-Bitclock-Slave
> > - frame-master in cpu-dai node means Codec-Frame-Slave
> > - bitclock-master in codec node means Codec-Bitclock-Master
> > - frame-master in codec node means Codec-Frame-Master
> >
> > For example in a cpu-dai mode bitclock-master parameter should produce
> > SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_* daifmt flags and a codec node
> > SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBM_* flags.
I had misunderstood about SND_SOC_DAIFMT_xxx
So, please ignore my previous comment.
But, I wounder, if cpu/codec use identical format flags,
then, asoc_simple_dai don't need fmt ?
struct asoc_simple_dai {
const char *name;
unsigned int fmt; <= we can/should remove this ?
unsigned int sysclk;
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
