From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx> There is a matching of_node_put() in __of_detach_node_sysfs() Remove misleading comment from function header comment for of_detach_node(). This patch may result in memory leaks from code that directly calls the dynamic node add and delete functions directly instead of using changesets. Tested-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx> --- This patch should result in powerpc systems that dynamically allocate a node, then later deallocate the node to have a memory leak when the node is deallocated. The next patch in the series will fix the leak. drivers/of/dynamic.c | 3 --- drivers/of/kobj.c | 4 +++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/dynamic.c b/drivers/of/dynamic.c index 12c3f9a15e94..146681540487 100644 --- a/drivers/of/dynamic.c +++ b/drivers/of/dynamic.c @@ -272,9 +272,6 @@ void __of_detach_node(struct device_node *np) /** * of_detach_node() - "Unplug" a node from the device tree. - * - * The caller must hold a reference to the node. The memory associated with - * the node is not freed until its refcount goes to zero. */ int of_detach_node(struct device_node *np) { diff --git a/drivers/of/kobj.c b/drivers/of/kobj.c index 7a0a18980b98..c72eef988041 100644 --- a/drivers/of/kobj.c +++ b/drivers/of/kobj.c @@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ int __of_attach_node_sysfs(struct device_node *np) } if (!name) return -ENOMEM; + + of_node_get(np); + rc = kobject_add(&np->kobj, parent, "%s", name); kfree(name); if (rc) @@ -159,6 +162,5 @@ void __of_detach_node_sysfs(struct device_node *np) kobject_del(&np->kobj); } - /* finally remove the kobj_init ref */ of_node_put(np); } -- Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxx>