On 10/03/14 07:53, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 08/03/14 14:25, Grant Likely wrote: > >> Sure. If endpoints are logical, then only create the ones actually >> hooked up. No problem there. But nor do I see any issue with having >> empty connections if the board author things it makes sense to have them >> in the dtsi. > > I don't think they are usually logical, although they probably might be > in some cases. The endpoint nodes are supposed to be logical, they just group properties describing a port's configuration. > As I see it, a "port" is a group of pins in a hardware component, and > two endpoints define a connection between two ports, which on the HW > level are the wires between the ports. > > So a port with two endpoints is a group of pins, with wires that go from > the same pins to two different components. It could be approximated like this, but I don't think it is needed. I would rather stay with only port nodes mapped to hardware and the endpoint nodes logical. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
