-----Original Message----- From: Poonam Aggrwal Sent: 2018年10月29日 19:09 To: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>; sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx; oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx Cc: ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>; Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx>; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>; Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>; Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/6] soc/fsl/guts: Add definition for LX2160A > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-arm-kernel > [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Vabhav Sharma > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 2:28 PM > To: sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx; oss@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; > linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; > gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; > kstewart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Leo Li > <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx>; shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx > Cc: ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx; Udit Kumar <udit.kumar@xxxxxxx>; Pankaj > Bansal <pankaj.bansal@xxxxxxx>; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx; Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@xxxxxxx>; Vabhav Sharma > <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx>; Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@xxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH v7 2/6] soc/fsl/guts: Add definition for LX2160A > > Adding compatible string "lx2160a-dcfg" to initialize guts driver for > lx2160 and SoC die attribute definition for LX2160A > > Signed-off-by: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sharma@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo.zhu@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c index > 302e0c8..bcab1ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c > @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ static const struct fsl_soc_die_attr fsl_soc_die[] = { > .svr = 0x87000000, > .mask = 0xfff70000, > }, > + /* Die: LX2160A, SoC: LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A */ > + { .die = "LX2160A", > + .svr = 0x87360000, >Do all the threevariants " LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A" have same SVR? Dear Poonam Aggrwal, No, but the threevariants " LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A" has same svr value in this struct, Because they all are variants of lx2160, the svr value in this struct is equal the soc svr && mask Best Regards, Yinbo Zhu. > + .mask = 0xff3f0000, > + }, > { }, > }; > > @@ -222,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id fsl_guts_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-dcfg", }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-dcfg", }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-dcfg", }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-dcfg", }, > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_guts_of_match); > -- > 2.7.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flist > s.infr > adead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-arm- > kernel&data=02%7C01%7Cpoonam.aggrwal%40nxp.com%7Cd9b7c36c786 > 54cd6dc4008d63d7fee63%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0 > %7C636764017001504288&sdata=pqFMlw6yVrHrvn4YRhqj%2FmoOnSscrZu > tcoYn3In8OJc%3D&reserved=0
