Rob Thanks On 10/24/2018 09:49 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 12:06:18PM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >> The LM3697 is a single function LED driver. The single function LED >> driver needs to reside in the LED directory as a dedicated LED driver >> and not as a MFD device. The device does have common brightness and ramp >> features and those can be accomodated by a TI LMU framework. >> >> The LM3697 dt binding needs to be moved from the ti-lmu.txt and a dedicated >> LED dt binding needs to be added. The new LM3697 LED dt binding will then >> reside in the Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds directory and follow the >> current LED and general bindings guidelines. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> >> --- >> >> v4 - Squashed removal and addition of the dt bindings into a single patch - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998703/ > > Still not really the sequence I'd like to see and what I think would > help the discussion move along. > > Patch 1: move all the devices out of ti-lmu.txt into the grouping which > makes sense. IOW, no functional changes. Probably only strict > sub/supersets of each other should be shared. > > Patch 2-N: Make binding changes. Then we discuss things like ramp time > properties separately from binding structure. > OK I will re-work the patchset. Dan >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3697.txt | 98 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti-lmu.txt | 26 +---- >> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lm3697.txt -- ------------------ Dan Murphy