On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:08 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 09:20:30PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > Bananapi S070WV20-CT16 ICN6211 is 800x480, 4-lane MIPI-DSI to RGB bridge panel, > > the same panel PCB comes with parallel RBG which is supported via > > panel-simple driver with "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible. > > > > But this binding is specific for MIPI DSI to RGB bridge panels, > > which usually accessed using MIPI DSI controller driver. > > > > for information: > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16" compatible for parallel RGB panels > > - "bananapi,s070wv20-ct16-icn6211" compatible for MIPI-DSI to RGB > > bridge panels > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Why not just reusing the same binding document? Agreed. Just put the MIPI-DSI-specific information you added here into the existing document. Rob suggested that we could even use the same compatible. That would make sense if you are modelling the entire panel + PCB as a module, instead of a panel node + a bridge node as I originally wanted. Don't worry, I gave it some thought and I think having a single combined panel node makes more sense. ChenYu
