On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 10:09:31AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 10:44:52AM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10/9/18 9:27 AM, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > Hi Gustavo, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 12:21:36AM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > >> SERDES_MAX is a valid value to index ctrl->phys in > > >> drivers/phy/mscc/phy-ocelot-serdes.c. But, currently, > > >> there is an out-of-bounds bug in the mentioned driver > > >> when reading from ctrl->phys, because the size of > > >> array ctrl->phys is SERDES_MAX. > > >> > > >> Partially fix this by updating SERDES_MAX to be SERDES6G_MAX + 1. > > >> > > >> Notice that this is the first part of the solution to > > >> the out-of-bounds bug mentioned above. Although this > > >> change is not dependent on any other one. > > >> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > Friendly ping. Who can you take this? > > Applied. No need (nor benefit) to ping me. You can check the status of > DT patches on patchwork[1]. If it is there and in the "New" state, it is > in my queue. Actually, this doesn't apply to my tree as the file doesn't exist. It needs to go thru the phy tree. You didn't Cc the maintainer nor list, so resend. Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> Rob
