Hello, On 05/10/2018 11:58:31-0500, Rob Herring wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..f788315b94fa > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: None > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: Atmel AT91 device tree bindings. > + > +maintainers: > + - Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > + - Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Jean-Christophe has not been active for years, I'd mention Ludovic instead. > +description: | > + Boards with a SoC of the Atmel AT91 or SMART family shall have the following > + > +properties: > + $nodename: > + const: '/' > + compatible: > + oneOf: > + - items: > + - const: atmel,at91rm9200 > + - items: > + - enum: > + - olimex,sam9-l9260 > + - enum: > + - atmel,at91sam9260 > + - atmel,at91sam9261 > + - atmel,at91sam9263 > + - atmel,at91sam9g20 > + - atmel,at91sam9g45 > + - atmel,at91sam9n12 > + - atmel,at91sam9rl > + - atmel,at91sam9xe > + - const: atmel,at91sam9 > + > + - items: > + - enum: > + - atmel,at91sam9g15 > + - atmel,at91sam9g25 > + - atmel,at91sam9g35 > + - atmel,at91sam9x25 > + - atmel,at91sam9x35 > + - const: atmel,at91sam9x5 > + - const: atmel,at91sam9 > + > + - items: > + - const: atmel,sama5d27 > + - const: atmel,sama5d2 > + - const: atmel,sama5 > + > + - description: Nattis v2 board with Natte v2 power board > + items: > + - const: axentia,nattis-2 > + - const: axentia,natte-2 > + - const: axentia,linea Shouldn't we have the board specific compatibles in a separate file to avoid mixing everything with the SoC compatibles? -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
