Hi Niklas, Thank you for the patch. On Thursday, 4 October 2018 23:41:34 EEST Niklas Söderlund wrote: > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The CSI-2 transmitters can use a different number of lanes to transmit > data. Make the data-lanes mandatory for the endpoints describe the s/describe/that describe/ ? > transmitters as no good default can be set to fallback on. > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.txt | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.txt index > 5dddc95f9cc46084..f9dac01ab795fc28 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/adv748x.txt > @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ are numbered as follows. > > The digital output port nodes must contain at least one endpoint. > > +The endpoints described in TXA and TXB ports must if present contain > +the data-lanes property as described in video-interfaces.txt. > + Would it make sense to merge those two paragraphs, as they refer to the same endpoint ? "The digital output port nodes, when present, shall contain at least one endpoint. Each of those endpoints shall contain the data-lanes property as described in video-interfaces.txt." (DT bindings normally use "shall" instead of "must", but that hasn't really been enforced.) If you want to keep the paragraphs separate, I would recommend using "digital output ports" instead of "TXA and TXB" in the second paragraph for consistency (or the other way around). I'm fine with any of the above option, so please pick your favourite, and add Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Ports are optional if they are not connected to anything at the hardware > level. > > Example: -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
