[...]
> static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct tegra_xusb_mbox_msg msg;
> @@ -1038,7 +1095,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto put_padctl;
> }
>
> - if (!pdev->dev.pm_domain) {
> + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "power-domains")) {
I am assuming the original check was because allowing the two
power-domains to be (wrongly) modeled as one (or as a
master+subdomain)?
I was thinking that, perhaps we should add a new OF helper function,
where one can get the number of specifiers being listed in the
power-domains property. Would that help to easier distinguish what to
do when dealing with backwards compatibility?
> tegra->host_rst = devm_reset_control_get(&pdev->dev,
> "xusb_host");
> if (IS_ERR(tegra->host_rst)) {
> @@ -1069,17 +1126,22 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> tegra->host_clk,
> tegra->host_rst);
> if (err) {
> + tegra_powergate_power_off(TEGRA_POWERGATE_XUSBA);
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "failed to enable XUSBC domain: %d\n", err);
> - goto disable_xusba;
> + goto put_padctl;
> }
> + } else {
> + err = tegra_xusb_powerdomain_init(&pdev->dev, tegra);
> + if (err)
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> tegra->supplies = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, tegra->soc->num_supplies,
> sizeof(*tegra->supplies), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tegra->supplies) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto disable_xusbc;
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < tegra->soc->num_supplies; i++)
> @@ -1089,7 +1151,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> tegra->supplies);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get regulators: %d\n", err);
> - goto disable_xusbc;
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < tegra->soc->num_types; i++)
> @@ -1099,7 +1161,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> sizeof(*tegra->phys), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!tegra->phys) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto disable_xusbc;
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> for (i = 0, k = 0; i < tegra->soc->num_types; i++) {
> @@ -1115,7 +1177,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> "failed to get PHY %s: %ld\n", prop,
> PTR_ERR(phy));
> err = PTR_ERR(phy);
> - goto disable_xusbc;
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> tegra->phys[k++] = phy;
> @@ -1126,7 +1188,7 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_name(&pdev->dev));
> if (!tegra->hcd) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto disable_xusbc;
> + goto put_powerdomains;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1222,12 +1284,13 @@ static int tegra_xusb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> disable_rpm:
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> usb_put_hcd(tegra->hcd);
> -disable_xusbc:
> - if (!pdev->dev.pm_domain)
> +put_powerdomains:
> + if (!of_property_read_bool(pdev->dev.of_node, "power-domains")) {
> tegra_powergate_power_off(TEGRA_POWERGATE_XUSBC);
> -disable_xusba:
> - if (!pdev->dev.pm_domain)
> tegra_powergate_power_off(TEGRA_POWERGATE_XUSBA);
> + } else {
> + tegra_xusb_powerdomain_remove(&pdev->dev, tegra);
> + }
> put_padctl:
> tegra_xusb_padctl_put(tegra->padctl);
> return err;
[...]
Kind regards
Uffe
