On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 3:20 AM Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 8:23 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:47:47PM +0200, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > > > Document new enable-gpio field. It can be used to disable the part > > > > enable-gpios > > > > > without turning down its regulator. > > > > > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ad5820.txt | 7 +++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ad5820.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ad5820.txt > > > index 5940ca11c021..9ccd96d3d5f0 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ad5820.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ad5820.txt > > > @@ -8,6 +8,12 @@ Required Properties: > > > > > > - VANA-supply: supply of voltage for VANA pin > > > > > > +Optional properties: > > > + > > > + - enable-gpios : GPIO spec for the XSHUTDOWN pin. Note that the polarity of > > > +the enable GPIO is the opposite of the XSHUTDOWN pin (asserting the enable > > > +GPIO deasserts the XSHUTDOWN signal and vice versa). > > > > shutdown-gpios is also standard and seems like it would make more sense > > here. Yes, it is a bit redundant to have both, but things just evolved > > that way and we don't want to totally abandon the hardware names (just > > all the variants). > > > > Sorry to insist > > The pin is called xshutdown, not shutdown and is inverse logic, > Wouldnt it make more sense to use the name > enable-gpios? Inverse of what? shutdown-gpios is the inverse of enable-gpios. By using shutdown-gpios you can just get rid of "Note that the polarity of the enable GPIO is the opposite of the XSHUTDOWN pin (asserting the enable GPIO deasserts the XSHUTDOWN signal and vice versa)." This looks to me like a case of just standardizing the name so for example we just have "reset" instead of many flavors like rst, RSTb, RESETb, RESETn, nRESET, etc. Rob
